Book an appointment with us, or search the directory to find the right lawyer for you directly through the app.
Find out moreThis special edition of Law Update, marking Al Tamimi & Company’s 35th anniversary, explores the evolving legal landscape of energy and climate law across the region.
As the Middle East prioritises sustainable growth, this edition examines key developments shaping the future of the sector. From the UAE’s Federal Law No. 11 of 2024 to advancements in green hydrogen, solar financing, and carbon capture technology, we spotlight the innovative strides and challenges defining this critical area.
We also go into Saudi Arabia’s initiatives to integrate carbon capture into its industrial expansion and Egypt’s AFRICARBONEX platform, which underscores the region’s commitment to a sustainable and inclusive future.
Join us as we celebrate 35 years of legal excellence and forward-thinking insights, paving the way for a more sustainable tomorrow.
Read NowAhmad Ghoneim - Partner - Litigation / Construction and Infrastructure
Ahmed Al Barwani - Partner, Head of Office - Oman - Corporate / Mergers and Acquisitions / Commercial
An Omani Urgent Matters Court (‘OUMC’) issued a decision to prevent the liquidation of an unconditional performance bond with a value in excess of US$17 million in respect of a mega-project in Oman. The employer called the performance bond during the execution of the project based on allegations that the contractor was in delay.
A contractor and a project developer contracted under the 1987 FIDIC conditions of contract, with particular conditions (‘Contract’), for the construction of a mega-project in Oman. The total project value exceeded US$100 million and covered an area of approximately 80,000 square metres. The project offered residential and hotel accommodation.
Prior to beginning construction, the main contractor issued multiple unconditional bonds, including performance bonds with an aggregate value in excess of US$17 million. The contractor commenced construction, and made significant progress on site; however, severe weather conditions caused by storm Mekunu adversely affected the construction site in the summer of 2018. Consequently, the project experienced delays in meeting milestones. The employer took the view that the project delays were not attributable to weather conditions and therefore, delayed project payments.
The employer notified the contractor that the latter was in breach of the Contract, an allegation that the contractor denied. Subsequently, the employer served a notice of termination to the contractor, followed by a request to liquidate the performance bonds.
As a result, the contractor issued civil proceedings against the employer. Simultaneously, the contractor also filed a case before the competent OUMC to, including but not limited to, record the status of the site, work done, materials on site, and equipment. The contractor also requested that the OUMC freeze the performance bond liquidation, pending the issuance of the judgment in the parties’ civil case. The contractor highlighted to the OUMC that a liquidation of the bonds would result in significant cash flow problems for the contractor and its value significantly exceeded the value of the remaining works. Furthermore, any breach by the contractor resulted from a force majeure event.
In support of its requests, the contractor cited the following articles from the Omani Civil Procedures Law:
This case highlights a useful and practical approach to performance bonds and injunctions. Contractors generally have been willing to provide employers with unconditional performance bonds, which provide employers with a safety net in the event the contractor defaults on its contractual obligations. Should a contractor fail to comply with the related contractual obligations, employers may ‘call’ the bond, which means that the issuing bank is not entitled to reject the liquidation of the bond, except where ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction. Therefore, a party wishing to prevent the liquidation of a performance must seek court intervention. This can be challenging. Currently, Omani law does not specify the circumstances in which a court can issue an injunction over a bond liquidation. As a result, applicants must present compelling grounds to persuade the OUMC to order an injunction to temporarily freeze the liquidation of the unconditional bond. Thereafter, the OUMC will determine, in its sole discretion, whether such grounds warrant freezing of the bond.
Al Tamimi & Company’s Construction & Litigation team regularly advises on construction related disputes in Oman. For further information, please contact Ahmad Ghoneim (a.ghoneim@tamimi.com) or Ahmed Al Barwani (a.albarwani@tamimi.com).
To learn more about our services and get the latest legal insights from across the Middle East and North Africa region, click on the link below.